ATP Series
Striking the Right Balance
Lifestyle, extremity function and prosthetic use are crucial in determining a limb loss client's needs. How do you address them all?
- By Haley Samsel
- Apr 01, 2020
ZEN STONES BALANCE CONCEPT: DEPOSITPHOTOS.COM/DMITRYRUKHLENKO
Of all the mantras that permeate
the complex rehab technology (CRT)
industry, one stands out from the rest: There
is no one-size-fits-all solution for patients,
who typically require customized devices
that can evolve with their mobility needs.
This is especially true when it comes to
clients with limb loss — a diverse patient
population that includes people born with
or without use of their upper or lower
extremities, as well as amputees who lost
limbs in traumatic incidents or because of
medical conditions such as cancer. Within
this category, Assistive Technology
Professionals (ATPs) encounter cases
ranging from kids with congenital limb
loss to veterans finding ways to remain
independent after losing extremities
during their military service.
Solving the mobility equation for these
clients is complicated by another factor:
the specific ways that people use prostheses
in their daily lives. While one adult
prefers to wear prosthetic devices nearly
every time they leave the home, another
may only use prostheses when they head
to work or travel.
But even as the varying uses of
prostheses present challenges with
balance, weight distribution and seating,
complex rehab professionals say there is a
common trait among nearly all clients
they serve, limb loss included: a desire to
get from point A to point B, and to do so
with as much independence as possible.
Now, the CRT industry must recognize
which solutions can help patients with
limb loss reach that goal, said Steffen
Tiskus, PT, Training and Development
Coordinator, Power Positioning, at Motion
Concepts.
“For greater levels of independence,
especially for individuals with lower-extremity
amputations who would have the
ability to independently put on and take off
their prosthetic limbs, there are products
that have been on the market for a number
of years that are just under-utilized,” Tiskus
said. “We are creatures of habit, but we need
to open doors to some of these products,
even if we’re less familiar with them.”
The Balance Equation
At the core of any wheelchair evaluation for a client who has lost
one or more limbs is their sense of balance. Children growing up
with congenital limb loss, due to their limbs not fully developing
in utero, develop their own sense of balance. This trait makes it
easier for children to transition to a chair as they get older, says
Angie Kiger, M.Ed, CTRS, ATP/SMS, who serves as the Clinical
Strategy and Education Manager for Sunrise Medical.
“It’s kind of a different ballgame,” Kiger said. “Because they were
born not knowing their limbs were there, they actually learn and
create their own sense of balance as they become mobile independently.
When they’re working on their core as they’re growing,
it’s a bit different than someone who lost their limbs later in life.”
Compare that experience to the wheelchair transition made by
Special Forces veteran and Sunrise Medical client Mark Holbert,
who lost both legs and some fingers on his right hand after
stepping on an IED during his 2010 tour in Afghanistan. Holbert,
now an active wheelchair user who prefers a folding-frame
ultralightweight manual chair, has had to try out several
products to figure out the right solution for his lifestyle.
Due to his injuries, Holbert’s right leg was amputated above
the knee, while his left side amputation goes up to his hip.
“For me to off-weight the pressure and try not to get pressure
sores, that was the biggest need for me,” Holbert told Mobility
Management. “I tried multiple seats and different kinds of
cushions, and I was constantly getting pressure sores left and
right, and that’s being out of the [prosthetic] socket.”
Holbert also experienced issues with balance when he wore
his lower limb prostheses while in his chair.
“When I was in a socket, it was bad if I had a cushion that was
pre-shaped foam because then my whole balance of sitting up
straight was off,” he added. “Now I had my prosthetics interfering
with the cushion.”
The best solution for Holbert, in his prosthetic devices and out,
was an air-celled cushion. He is now able to sit on the softer,
more adjustable surface all day without developing the painful
and dangerous pressure injuries that can plague people with
limb loss. But the air cushion presents some unique balance
challenges of its own, Holbert and Kiger noted.
“Mark has got a super strong upper body, and so transfers for
him, even though he is missing most of the left leg, are easier,”
Kiger said. “Sometimes people will report the full air-cell cushion
can be difficult to navigate because it doesn’t provide them the
firm support that a foam cushion may provide them.”
Switching to the air cushion from a foam solution made it
harder for Holbert to balance his upper body as he tried to propel
himself forward with a manual chair. Overall, though, it works
better for his day-to-day lifestyle.
“When I tried to push forward, it was hard to lean further in
because I had no support,” Holbert said. “So now when I use my
racing chair, I’ll have a smaller cushion that’s foam, and that
gives me a more stable platform for me to push forward when I’m
racing or just working out.”
It’s not uncommon for clients with limb loss to wish they could
switch out cushions based on the activity and whether or not
they are wearing prostheses, Kiger said. The process of trial and
error for civilian clients is more difficult since they do not have
the same access to additional products as military patients may
have, she added. The funding process differs in every situation.
Kiger and Sunrise Medical are also working to address a
common complaint of both people with congenital limb loss and
amputees: feeling constantly overheated while in their chairs. Limb loss means less ability to manage body temperature via
sweating, as clients have a smaller overall skin surface area.
Sunrise Medical recently began offering the JAY Fluid cushion
with Cryo Technology, which aims to prevent pressure injuries
and cool the patient’s skin for up to eight hours.
Overheating is a constant issue for a Sunrise Medical client
named Gabe, born without upper or lower extremities.
“He gets so hot so quickly, so he needs to make sure whatever
his seating is made out of is breathable, because his temperature
instability is crazy,” Kiger said. “It’s not just what’s in the material
as far as what’s inside the seating support, but it’s also: Is there a
way to cool the person?”
Customizing Power Systems for Protheses
Holbert, a proponent of ultralightweight manual chairs that allow
him to travel and more efficiently get in and out of a vehicle, has
the upper-body strength to propel himself forward, and prefers it
that way. While power chairs may also be the choice for limb loss
clients, Kiger said the focus is on the functional abilities of the
client and their priorities.
“I had one young man that I met that said his therapist had
tried for years to push him toward a power chair and he said: ‘I
don’t want it. I want to be able to go into the city streets and hang
out with my buddies. If I get a power chair, I’m actually slower,’”
she said. “With kiddos, they just want to get out and play and
interact as fast as possible.”
But most limb loss clients do require a power chair system,
whether it’s due to age, strength levels or their ability to use their
extremities, said Tiskus of Motion Concepts. CRT companies
already offer devices and customizations that can increase
independence for clients while using the chair and when
transferring in and out of it.
“The reality is, depending on the age of the patient, our bodies
were never meant to do that type of repetitive motion, coupled with
the patient’s body weight, coupled with the weight of a manual chair,
even the lightweight wheelchairs,” Tiskus said. “We tend to gravitate
more towards power chairs to save their shoulder joints so they still
have the ability to do activities of daily living with their upper
extremities, and reduce the amount of fatigue that they experience.”
The power chair systems they use are dependent on what type
of prostheses they use, and how much dexterity they have with
the prosthetic limbs, he said.
“If they have limited dexterity, there’s different types of
switches, different types of specialty input devices like head
arrays or chin booms,” Tiskus said. “We have a power chin
boom, a separate switch wherever it makes sense to mount it,
that allows them to independently adjust height and swing the
device out of the way when they need it to for transfers or to have
a conversation without the joystick in front of them.”
Independent transfers can also be difficult without the help of
a customized power system, according to Tiskus. His company
offers a power-down transfer arm for lateral transfers, as it can be
hard for someone with non-functional extremities to scoot off a
slide board to transfer out of their chair.
“It’s very difficult for somebody with no use of their upper
extremities to position a slide board and make sure it’s in an appropriate
position for their specific needs,” Tiskus said. “The system is
mounted directly on a dual-post armrest, they hit a switch, and this
will actually power down and convert them to a transfer support
system, such as a modified slide board that can be padded, solid, gels.”
One product that Tiskus has seen consistently help limb loss
clients is the vertical platform lift, an elevator in the front part of
the seating system that can allow somebody to shift body weight
as they come forward out of the chair.
“From there, they have the ability to hit whatever switch makes
sense for them that they can access that will lower them to the
ground and then they can scoot forward,” Tiskus said. “It allows for
safe transfers from the floor to the seat and back and vice versa.”
Evaluating What CRT Can Offer
There is no lack of solutions for people with limb loss. But amputees
and clients with congenital limb loss can certainly benefit
from ATPs and other CRT professionals evaluating how they can
better cater to this patient population.
Kiger said the CRT team should remember small aspects of a
mobility system that can make clients’ lives more comfortable,
such as putting in a piece on chairs for residual limbs.
“If they don’t have their prosthetic on or do not have a
prosthetic, it’s uncomfortable from a pressure standpoint,
depending on where the limb was amputated, for it to be hanging
there,” Kiger said. “Sometimes people don’t think to add that
extra component to support it. If you’ve got your prosthetics on,
in theory, they would be able to use the footplate. But if you don’t
have it on at that point, it could be uncomfortable.”
Other solutions can be considered for pressure management as
well. Beyond traditional tilt and recline systems and lateral tilt
systems for clients who cannot tolerate a full range of redistribution,
Tiskus has seen anterior (forward) tilt work well for clients
with lower-extremity amputations.
“We worked with several patients who have lower-extremity
limb loss, and they have the ability to independently put on and
take off those prosthetic limbs,” Tiskus said. “They just need to
be in a position more anterior to allow them to access the
prosthetic limb and be able to take it on and off and then help
transition from that seated to a standing position.”
Motion Concepts’ UpFront system allows for up to 45° of
anterior tilt, reflecting a growing trend among manufacturers that
are increasingly offering forward tilt. Tiskus noted that anterior
tilt appears under-utilized, and clients could immediately benefit
from its broad adoption.
“I’d love to see people taking a closer look at this because those
systems can really make a difference to give a greater level of
independence to somebody, especially for sit-to-stand transfers,”
Tiskus said. “Hopefully with more exposure, with more manufacturers
making products like this, it will open a door and give
greater levels of independence for these individuals.”
This article originally appeared in the Apr/May 2020 issue of Mobility Management.